How can we raise student awareness about how students can best learn and
help them find more ways of learning English more effectively and productively?
Exemplify this through the lens of a student and a prospective ELT
practitioner.
To increase awareness
about how to improve the English learning process involves many aspects. Based
on chapter four of the book ¨Learning Teaching¨ by Jim Scrivener it is
important to know who the learners are. It is essential to know what the characteristics
of the group are, the different learning styles that students possess and their
needs for learning a foreign language. As a student, I consider that to be
aware of that not everybody learns in the same way is essential for teachers
because in that way teachers are able to
adapt their lessons to the different learning styles: visual, auditory
and kinesthetic. Consequently, the learning process will take place in an
environment in which all the students will be engaged learning at their own
pace. The process of getting acquainted with the foreign language will be
easier for us students if the lessons are directed to our learning styles and
needs.
How would you deal with error correction in your classroom (s)? Watch
the DVD and see how to work with Errors Teaching Technique. What’s your take on
testing?
According to chapter twelve Focusing on Language of the book ¨Learning
Teaching¨ human beings have always learned by trial and error and learning a
new language is not the exception. That is why, committing errors is not as bad
as it may seem.
I consider that committing errors while learning a language is essential
for both, teachers and learners because errors give a parameter of how the
learning process has advanced. It is what shows us, as teacher that the learner
is internalizing the language.
There are many aspects to take
into account in order to correct errors. For me, it is very important to know
when to correct them because if I am not aware of it I may hinder the
production of language. For example, if it is an activity focused on accuracy,
I go for correcting the error on the spot to prevent the student from committing
the same error again. But if it is an activity focused on fluency, I correct it
till the activity has finished. If I
corrected the error while the learner is speaking, it may cut the flow of the
activity. An example of this is an impromptu speech activity; the teacher cannot
keep interrupting the student because the student will feel intimidated and
afraid of continue speaking.
I would make use of different
techniques to correct errors such as Self-Correction because through this the
learner realizes by himself that what he is saying in not right and he corrects
himself. This helps him not to commit the same error again. Also, the use of
gestures combined with facial expressions because in this way the learners will
realize that there is something wrong that need to be corrected. Moreover, I
would make use of the finger correction technique because indicating where the
error has been committed is easier. Every finger represents a word of the
sentences, and the teacher has to point to a finger as the words of the
sentence are said. When the teacher reaches the point in which the error has
been committed, he makes emphasis on it. The student gets a clear visual
indication of the shape of the sentence. I think this technique is very useful
because it helps us to clarify the structure of the sentence and for instant
error in spoken language. Definitely, I
would make use of it.
¨What you tell me, I forget; what I discover for myself I remember.¨
Testing
I think that testing is a good
tool to determine students’ ability to complete certain tasks or to demonstrate
that they master a skill or knowledge of content. A test can be directed to
evaluate either of the four languages skills: writing, speaking, listening, and
reading.
Assessing what the students have
learned during a course in a certain period of time is useful because it allows
us teacher to know how much learning they have grasped. However, I consider
that a test not always show the level of learning that a student possesses
because they may be many causes for him to get a poor grade such as nervousness
at the time he is taking the test.
I strongly agree with what the book ¨Learning teaching¨ says about the
criteria that a good test should have (Chapter 12; page 290-291). A good test
will seem fair and appropriate to the students. It is obvious that to assess
students in something they have not been taught yet is unfair. A good test must
be designed according to the learning level that the learners have. For
example, it is non-sense to make basic students take a test that is designed
for advanced learners.
It will not be troublesome to
mark. The test must have clear instructions of what is required in each of its
sections so that students do not get confused while taking the test. If we do
not state clear instructions how do expect students to give us the right
answer?
It
is very important that the application of a test has clear purposes. We, as
teacher must make sure that students know why they are taking a test. For
example, if they are going to take a test based on the three following units of
the book that they have not been taught yet, it is important to tell them that
this is a diagnostic test. This diagnostic test will help to know in which
areas the students need more reinforcement.
A pen-and-paper-test may include discrete items and integrative tasks
that can be marked either objectively or subjectively. It is important to give
clear instructions in this kind of test because sometimes the answer can be
correct, but if it is not the one that we as teacher wanted, we mark it as
wrong. This is unfair for the students, that´s why I consider that we may be
very careful while designing a test.
What is more
difficult: teaching teens or large classes?
I think that it is more difficult to teach teenagers than large classes
because teenagers bring to the classroom the conflicts that they are going
through due to their age. Adolescence is a very complicated stage in which many
physical and mental changes take place. Teenagers are characterized by being
rebellious and this make them be reluctant to learn. Sometimes, teachers want
to develop an activity and they find that it is almost impossible to be carried
out because teenagers are not willing to participate. They are afraid of being
embarrassed in front of their classmates. Moreover, they do not like to be
patronized because they think that nobody has the right to tell them what to
do. Teaching teenagers is a big challenge while large classes can be easier to
teach because there are many different techniques such as sitting arrangement
and small group discussions that can be applied in order to deliver the lesson
effectively. In most of the cases the
budget and the lack of space or teacher are the factors that contribute to
larger classes. Both groups have their level of complexity, but with a little
of creativity we can manage to teach them.
Teaching Teenagers vs Teaching Large Classes
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCongrats, you really have aced this assignment..perfectly crafted!!
ReplyDeleteThank you teacher!! :)
ReplyDelete